Tuesday, October 30, 2007

IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST MADE BY THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION...




THIS IS NOT FANTASY OR DELUSION. THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO OUR FAMILIES. WITHOUT KNOWING, YOU OR YOUR LOVED ONES, MAY BE NOW THE SUBJECT OF DEADLY SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE AND ORGANIZED STALKING. 10-30-07


My children and I are victims of torture. Please See Exhibits "1", "2", and "3', which describe the harm caused on myself and on my children by radiation directed by satellite as retaliation for denouncing discrimination and fraud of federal funds against members of the judiciary. See http://jesusmendozza.blogspotcom/






In response to a request made by the Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act, the US government declassified documents describing how the Department of Defense initiated a program to kill those who denounce injustice in a way that the victim could not sense the aggression, and on a way that it was impossible to trace the aggression to the United States government. (Please See "The Cold War Secret," The Monitor, at 4B; "Army Studied Radioactive Poison for Cold War", San Antonio Express- News at 1A, (Oct. 10, 2007). This case points to evidence on the federal record showing how members of the judiciary have attempted to conceal the fact that this Program has developed into an instrument of torture an murder.



This case demonstrates that there are no safeguards in place to impede that the same mentality that tortured, maimed, and murdered women and children in concentration camps, use these technologies to make homes, vehicles, schools, courts, hospitals, congregations, and even border crossings, virtual microwave ovens.






Gang staking includes a pervasive organized harassment, including road harassment to cause sensory overloads and harm the targets in a way that appears natural, accidental, or the result of a mental problem. To recruit mob support, Hate within this area circulate false rumors that the targets are child molesters, drug dealers, a spies, terrorists etc,. An investigation over this case may expose the number of victims that have been killed as a result of mob harassment and may expose how officials have excluded from their reports evidence of their participation on the motive that is inciting these tragedies on educational institutions across our nation. Without knowing, your neighbors, your employees your clergy, and even family members may be involved in this type of terrorism. Children have been picked up dead from the pavement in this area. See http://www.multistalkervictims.org/terstalk.htm






Please send this documents to your State and federal legislators demanding an explanation in writing about electronic assaults and gang stalking. Your legislator has a duty to tell you the truth. Do not allow apathy, skepticism, or indifference make you another victim of these terrifying technologies. There is hardly anything more important than learning about these terrifying threats to our families. Everyday we live this torture. Please pray for us.






Should you have information about these activities please call Jesus Mendoza, 2202 E. 28h St. Mission, Texas 78574 Tel. 956/ 519-7166 jessemm7@yahoo.co









Exhibit "1" describes some of swelling, pain, suffering, caused on our family by satellite directed radiation and which intensity is comparable to the radiation used by a microwave oven.



Photo "A" shows both of my in-laws at the time the satellite aggression started. Photo "B" shows my in-laws during the satellite aggression and before my mother-in-law was tortured to death. Photo "C" is my father-in-law during the electronic aggression. Photo "D" shows how the swelling caused by exposure to radiation inside the skull is displacing one of my eyes out of place. Photo "E" is a picture of my three youngest children. Photos "F', "G,", "H" "I", "J' and "K" show the swelling, pain and suffering caused by the radiation aggression on my children and on myself. Photos "K", "L", and "M" show detection equipment indicating that an electronic aggression is taking place. Photos "K", "L", "M" show the full range of the meter indicating 110 thousand milliroentgens per hour- 350 thousands counts per minute of gamma radiation. Photo "N" is a cartoon depicting some of the technology used to direct harmful radiation on unsuspected victims in order to monitor activity inside walls and even in a moving vehicle.



Exhibit "1" and video recordings have been introduced in federal litigation as evidence of the pain and suffering caused on our family by an electronic aggression.



Twice, my seven year old daughter has been referred to the cardiologist. My youngest daughter developed a tumor on her foot and an inability to move one finger on each hand. Both have been found with speech problems. My children complain of pain constantly and appear disoriented at times. My wife has been found with erratic blood pressure, and heart beat.



During federal litigation, these evidence including testimony of victims, video -tape evidence, and documentation showing how the federal government is using radiation to torture American citizens has been presented without opposition in federal courts. Please See "Some Aspects of Electromagnetic Weapons," Synopsis prepared for the International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium, by David Guyatt, (1996).



In response to evidence of torture by electronic aggression, the US Attorney General has claimed that the use of gamma and x-rays for surveillance of residences is legal.






ESTO NO ES FANTASIA O DELIRIO MENTAL. ESTO ES UNA SERIA AMENAZA PARA NUESTRAS FAMILIAS. SIN SABERLO, USTED Y SUS SERES QUERIDOS PODRIAN SER OBJETO DE MORTAL MONITOREO POR SATELITE Y ACOSO ORGANISADO



Mis hijos y yo somos victimas de tortura. Este documento detalla como miembros del poder judicial han cometido fraude para esconder evidencia demostrando que radiacion dirigida y acoso organisado son parte de un programa para torturar aquellos que han denunciado corrupcion. Exhibits "1", "2", and "3', describe el dano causado por radiacion dirigida por satelite por denunciar corrupcion contra miembros del poder judicial. See http://jesusmendozza.blogspotcom/



En respuesta a una demanda, el govierno federal ha entregado a la Prensa Asociada documentos que decriben un programa iniciado por el Departamento de Defensa para matar aquellos que se quejan de injusticia de un modo que la victima no se de cuenta, y de un modo que no quede evidencia de que el asesinato fue causado por el govierno federal. ("The Cold War Secret," The Monitor, at 4B; "Army Studied Radioactive Poison for Cold War", San Antonio Express- News at 1A, (Oct. 10, 2007).






Este caso demuestra que no hay nada que impida que la misma mentalidad que toruro y asesino mujeres y ninos in campos de concentacion use esta tecnologia para convertir hogares, oficinas, hospitales, escuelas, congregaciones, veiculos, y hasta puentes internacionales en verdaderos hornos de microndas.






Acoso Organisado incluye hostigamiento veicular con el proposito de amagar, desorientar, y causar dano de un modo que se vea natural, accidental, o el resultado de un problema mental. Para recrutar acosadores, Racismo en esta area, circula falsos rumores que la victima es violador de ninos, drogadicto, prostituta, espia, terrorista etc. Una investigacion de acoso organisado puede dar cuenta de el numero de victimas causado por hostigamiento veicular, y puede dar cuenta de como oficiales han escondido su participacion en los reportes de las tragedias estudiantiles qe estan ocurriendo en diferentes partes de el pais.



Sin saberlo, sus vecinos, sus empleados, y hasta miembros de su familia puden haber sido victimas o estar envueltos en este tipo de terrorismo. Ninos han sido levantados muertos del pavimento en esta area. See http://www.multistalkervictims.org/terstalk.htm



No permita que la apatia, escepticismo, o indiferencia lo hagan victima de esta maldad. Por favor mande este documento a su legislador federal y estatal, exigiendo una explicacion por escrito de agreciones electronicas y acoso organisado. Su legislador tiene la obligacion de decirle la verdad. No hay nada mas importante que poteger nuestras familias de esta seria amenaza.



Cada dia vivimos esta tortura. Le agradecemos sus oraciones.






Para mas informacion contacte a Jesus Mendoza, 2202 E. 28h St. Mission, Texas 78574 Tel. (956) 519-7140, (956) 519-7166 jessemm7@yahoo.com






EXHIBIT "1" ES EVIDENCIA DEL DANO CAUSADO POR UNA AGRECION ELECTRONICA Y DEMUESTRAN LA INFLAMACION, EL DOLOR Y SUFRIMIENTO CAUSADO POR RADIACION DIRIGIDA POR SATELITE QUE EQUIVALE A LA RADIACION USADA EN UN HORNO MICRONDAS.



Foto "A", son mis suegros cuando empezaba la agrecion electronica. Foto "B", son mis suegros durante la tortura electronica, antes de que falleciera mi suegra. Foto "C", es mi suegro durante la agrecion electronica. Foto "D", demuestra los efectos de la radiacion en el interior de mi craneo, y como la inflamacion esta sacando un ojo fuera de lugar. Foto "E", son mis ninos mas pequenos. Fotos "F", "G", "H", "I", "J" y "K", demuestra la inflamacion, el dolor y sufrimiento causado en mis ninos y en mi, durante la agrecion electronica. Fotos "K", "L", y "M", es equipo de deteccion de radiacion indicando los limites del detector, 110, 000 Milliroentgens por hora- 350,000 unidades por minuto de radiacion Gama. Foto "N", is una caricatura illustrando parte de la tecnologia usada por esta adminstracion para monitorear actividad en el interior de residencias, y hasta en vehiculos en movimiento. Dos veces mi hija de siete anos ha sido examinada de problemas de corazon. Mis dos hijas sufren problemas de lenguage. Mi nina de dos anos desarroyo un tumor en el pie, y se le habian atrofiado dos dedos de las manos. Mis ninos se quejan de dolor constantemente, y a veces se ven desorientados. Mi esposa ha sufrido de pulso y presion arterial erraticos. Esta evidencia, incluendo testimonio de victimas, video, y documentos demostrando que el govierno federal esta uando radiacion para torturar victimas inocentes ha sido presentados a tribunales federales sin oposicion de el Pocurador General. Please See "Some Aspects of Electromagnetic Weapons," Synopsis prepared for the International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium, by David Guyatt, (1996). En respusta a esta evidencia, el Procurador Federal General no niega la agrecion argumentando que el uso de rayos equis y gama para monitoreo de residencias es legal.






















































Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today!





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Friday, October 12, 2007

Complaint of Violation of Civil Rights and Request for Help.

10-12-07
Honorable Michael B. Mukasey,
United States Attorney General, US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C., 20530-0001
Re: Complaint of Violation of Civil Rights and Request for Help.
Honorable United States Attorney General :
In response to a request made by the Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act, the US government declassified documents describing how during the cold war, the government initiated a program to employ radiation to kill those who denounce injustice in a way that the victim could not sense the aggression and on a way that it was impossible to trace the aggression to the US government. (Please See "The Cold War Secret," The Monitor, at 4B; "Army Studied Radioactive Poison for Cold War", San Antonio Express- News at 1A, (Oct. 10, 2007).
My family and I are victims of radiation aggressions and organized stalking as retaliation for denouncing racial discrimination, and fraud of federal funds against members of the judiciary. This Complaint points out to specific and concrete evidence on the record showing how the President of the United States has influenced courts and agencies to discredit the harm caused by directed energy as delusional or fantastic.
Alberto Gonzales, former US Attorney General, through his counsel of record, has claimed that the use of x-rays and gamma rays is legal for surveillance of residences. Attached are Exhibits "1" , "2" and "3" which describe some of the harm caused on myself and on my children by directed radiation. During his farewell statements, Mr. Gonzales claimed that during his tenure as Attorney General he witnessed depravity that he though the man was not capable off. An investigation of this case may determine whether torturing women and children by directed radiation is the type of depravity Mr. Gonzales was referring to.
An investigation over this case may expose the number of victims that have been killed as a result of organized stalking and may expose how officials have excluded from their reports evidence of their participation and the motive that is causing these tragedies on educational institutions across the nation.
The cases below expose the fact that there are no safeguards in place to impede that the same mentality that tortured and murdered women and children in concentration camps make homes, churches, schools and even vehicles, virtual microwave ovens..
This type of terrorism could be considered now the most serious threat to American families. Everyday we live this torture. We need your help to stop these aggressions.
The following cases point to specific and concrete instances in the record where members of the judiciary engaged in fraud of the courts to discredit the harm caused by directed radiation and organized harassment.
In May 1995, I started my law studies at The Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing Michigan, relying on a promise of an equal opportunity to compete for a law degree. Many of the law students at the law school claimed affiliation with federal law enforcement and investigative agencies. The resume of the Dean of the law school Don Le Duc indicates that he held several positions with the US Department of Justice. At the end of 1997, I submitted evidence to the Mr. Le Duc showing how the president of the law school, former judge Thomas E. Brennan and judge Roman S. Briggs were operating a scheme to defraud minorities of their federal loans. A few days after, I became the subject of a malicious federal investigation, radiation surveillance and organized harassment. During that time, John Brennan was heading the CIA's Counter Terrorism Center.
(After his retirement, John Brennan denounced the Department of Defense use of military technology for domestic surveillance as a major mistake, "Military Taking Bigger Spying Role in War on Terrorism", San Antonio Express-News at 3A (March 8, 2006).
The pervasive harassment forced me to leave my studies one month away from finishing my last semester of school in the State of Michigan, and I returned to my home town, Mission, Texas. I left the law school in good academic and moral standing.
In February of 1999, I filed a federal law suit seeking redress for the physical harm caused by the malicious overexposure to radiation, an electrical sensitivity. Please See Exhibit "1", and "3a" and "3b." The Second Amended Complaint details how members of the judiciary and of the bar are operating a scheme to deprive minorities of the opportunity to obtain a law degree, while giving away law degrees to those affiliated with government agencies.
The late US District Judge Filemon Vela, assigned the case to US Magistrate Judge Dorina Ramos. Judge Ramos ordered the transfer of the case from Mcallen Texas, to the US District Court in Grand Rapids Michigan, despite of conclusive evidence on the record showing that the Defendants made false statements to the Court in their efforts to transfer the case; despite evidence showing that the harm caused by the retaliatory electronic aggression had impaired my ability to travel long distances; and despite conclusive evidence of the law school fraudulent activities within the State of Texas. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v. The Thomas M. Cooley Law School, et al, Southern Dist. of Texas US Dist. of TX, Mcallen, Division, Case M-99-77.
The litigation continued in Grand Rapids, Michigan by mail and by telephonic conferences. US District Judge Robert Holmes Bell assigned the case to US Magistrate Joseph G. Scoville, a professor a the Defendant's law school. During the litigation, I sought accommodations to my disability to prevent that the law school defendants take advantage of my health condition during the litigation. In response to my requests, Judge Scoville issued a warning of sanctions if I ever requested to the court consideration of my disability.
Following the Court's pretrial schedule, I filed an Amended Complaint that included as defendants some law school graduates, members of the judiciary that composed the law school Board of Directors. Judge Holmes Bell denied the filing of the Amended Complaint on the ground that the Motion was filed one day before the deadline. A motion for Summary Judgement established as a matter of law the Defendants' fraudulent scheme, the harm caused by the retaliatory electronic aggression, and my mental stability.
At the time the radiation aggression intensified aggravating my health condition, the defendants sought to take depositions at places that I could not appear. I filed a timely motion seeking protection from the court. Judge Holmes Bell ignored the Motion and dismissed the case as a sanction after my health condition did not allow me to appear to scheduled depositions. On May 2003, a panel composed by Judge Boggs and Daughtrey, Circuit Judges and Oberdorfer District Judge, declined to consider the defendants' fraudulent conduct. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v. The Thomas M. Cooley Law School, et al, US Dist. Court for the Western. Dist. MI., Case No. 5: 01cv93; US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 02-2095.
On January of the year 2003, I filed a law suit against the US Attorney General John Ashcroft seeking an Order to stop the electronic aggression after I saw my children with convulsions and seizures while detection equipment was showing high intensities of radiation inside our home. (Maldonado v Ashcroft, US Dist. Court for the Southern Dist. of Texas, Mcallen division, Case No. M 03-038). US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa assigned US Magistrate Judge Dorina Ramos to the case. Judge Ramos recused herself in response to evidence of her judicial misconduct to benefit those engaged in fraud of federal funds, discrimination and retaliation. US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa reassigned Judge Ramos to the case. On a hearing before Judge Ramos, my wife testified to the pain and suffering caused on myself and on my children when detection equipment shows high intensities of directed radiation inside our home. Judge Ramos altered the testimony of my wife to discredit evidence of electronic aggression and to imply that I am delusional. Judge Hinojosa disregarded the evidence on the record of alteration of testimony by Judge Ramos and dismissed the case. (Subsequent to the alteration of testimony, President George W. Bush appointed Judge Hinojosa to head the US Sentencing Commission. According the Dr. Jerry Polinard, a government professor at the University of Texas Pan-American, Judge Hinojosa was the first choice for nomination to the US Supreme Court by former President Bush).
At no time the US Attorney, nor the US Attorney General opposed evidence on the record of the judicial misconduct by Judge Hinojosa and Judge Ramos. (Maldonado v Ashcroft, Case No. M 03-038, audiotape of hearing, Docket No. 29, Docket No. 32, at five, Statement of Evidence, Docket No. 40).
During the litigation of this case, neither the US Attorney nor the US Attorney General opposed video tape evidence of the pain and suffering caused on myself and on my children while detection equipment indicated an electronic aggression; evidence that federal agencies are using harmful satellite radiation technologies which are otherwise reserved for national security and the military to direct radiation into residences; an affidavit of a former government agent who was sent to the emergency room with internal bleeding every time he offered to testify in court to the legitimacy of my claims of electronic aggression; and evidence showing how three federal agents, (Mark Miller, Michael Rodriguez, and Jeffrey Schrimer), who identified themselves to the principal of the school as FBI agents, engaged in harassment at my work place, a day I attempted to file a criminal complaint against the law school defendants. During the litigation of this case, David L. Guerra, counsel of record for the US Attorney General acknowledged my mental stability, and claimed that the use of ionizing radiation (x- and gamma rays) for surveillance of residences is legal. (Please See Exhibits "1" and "2", and "3"which illustrate and describe the harm caused on myself and on my children by x- and gamma radiation).
A panel composed by US District Judges Reavley, Wiener, and Benavides recognized my electrical sensitivity, the harm caused by the electronic aggression. However, the panel declined to address the judicial misconduct of Judge Hinojosa and Judge Ramos. On December of 2004, the same panel denied the Petition for Rehearing in Banc. US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Case No. 04-40095. On the year 2005, the US Supreme Court declined to hear the case. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. S. Ct., Case No. 04-9908.
Judge Ramos and Judge Hinojosa declined an invitation by the Judicial Council of Fifth Court of Appeals to engage the evidence of their judicial misconduct. However, Carolyn Dineen King, the Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declined to consider specific and concrete evidence of fraud on the court by Judge Ramos and Judge Hinojosa. I filed a Petition for Review to the Judicial Council. On October of 2004, Judge E. Grady Jolly signed an Order affirming the dismissal of the Complaints. Complaints of Judicial Misconduct Nos. 04-05-372-0089 and 90. (According to Joseph St. Amant, a spokesman for the Judicial Council of the US Court of Appeals, during eight or nine years, and hundreds of complaints of judicial misconduct, only one Complaint has resulted in sanctions. "Federal judge known for dispensing humor finds himself on trouble", San Antonio Express-News, at 9B, October 3, 2007).
The radiation aggression divested my immune system of the ability to tolerate environmental radiation. Exposure to radiation emitted by power lines, flourescent lights, video display terminals, air conditioning motors, cellular telephones, etc., causes me among other things, swelling of vital organs, internal bleeding, breathing problems, loss of concentration and speech impairment. My ability to work, to be inside buildings and to travel are substantially impaired. I have been critically ill several times, I am in pain all the time. An Administrative Law Judge for the Social Security Administration found my electrical sensitivity, a severe impairment. Please See Exhibit "3". However, the Judge denied my applications for disability benefits, and I appealed to federal court.
The case was assigned to US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. Judge Hinojosa did not recuse himself from the case and assigned the case to US Magistrate Judge Peter E. Ormsby. On a telephonic hearing on November 21, 2005, counsel for the Social Security Administration did not oppose evidence of their false statements on their motion for summary judgement. Judge Ormsby expressed his sympathy for my situation and implied that a favorable recommendation was forthcoming. During the year 2006, the Clerk of the district court claimed that a Report and Recommendation had been issued but had not been entered, and then claimed that a Recommendation had not been issued. Despite conclusive evidence demonstrating that I am entitled to disability insurance benefits, the case is still pending. (Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v The Social Security Administration, US Dist. Ct. S. Dist of TX., Mcallen Division, Case No. M-05-133).
We have been victims of organized staking. I have been a victim of a drive by shooting, death treats, and attempts to run over myself and my children among other things. Organized stalking includes high speed road harassment, pervasive monitoring of the target, and attempts to disrupt daily routines to overload the senses of the target aimed to cause emotional disturbances and to cause harm in a way that appears natural, accidental or self inflicted. Pervasive harassment in schools and universities may be responsible for causing many of tragedies that are occurring across the nation. On some cases organized stalking may use satellite tracking and other surveillance technologies to coordinate mob harassment. Some evidence indicates that funding, technology and organization comes from federal programs. Many victims of electronic aggression are also victims of organized stalking. Hate groups and groups within federal funded sects in this area organize the local stalking groups. They fuel support and participation from others by circulating false rumors that the target is mentally insane, child molester, drug dealer, a prostitute, homosexual, spy, terrorist, etc. People from all walks of life, from the homeless to professional people, compose these groups. Members of these groups are found on the courts, on the universities, hospitals, the clergy and even on law enforcement agencies. For a description of organized stalking Please See http://www.multistalkervictims.org/terstalk.htm
Mr. Terry Leonard, one of my neighbors is a US assistant Attorney, in Mcallen, Texas. Mr. Leonard is one of the US prosecutors that have engaged in this type of harassment. Mr. Leonard may have information of those using electronic weapons in this area. My former next-door neighbor the late Consuelo Pullen, claimed that Mr. Leonard was familiar with electronic surveillance of my home. Mrs. Pullen died of complications of lupus, a rare condition that can be attributed to overexposure to radiation. Mrs.' Pullen next-door neighbor suffered the same condition. My next-door neighbor, Juanita Wilburn died of complications caused by Lupus a few month ago. At several times, I found extreme intensities of radiation at the homes of both, Mrs. Pullen and of Mrs. Wilbert.
The organized harassment intensified after I brought claims of judicial misconduct against Judge Ramos, and against Judge Hinojosa. Some of the identified culprits include Michael James Lindquist, a self proclaimed apostle of a non-Christian federal funded congregation; Diane K. Smedley, a high school teacher; Ruth Watkins, the wife of a high school teacher; and Christopher T. Lohden, a pilot of a local bank. Without a hearing and despite of defendants' admissions and incriminating evidence, US District Judge Lynn N. Hughes, dismissed the case. The Defendants did not oppose the evidence of their harassment nor the appeal. However on September of 2006, a panel composed of Chief Judge Jones, and King and Dennis found the appeal frivolous and issued a warning of sanctions. Maldonado v Lindquist, et al, US District Court Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Case N0. H-05-97.(US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Case No. 05-20257. (Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King was not qualified to hear this case since she had declined to consider conclusive evidence on the record of the fraud on the court by US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa and US Magistrate Dorina Ramos).
While my wife was absent, I was involuntarily committed to a state hospital after my mother acted on the misbelief that I was neglecting medical care and on the misbelief that a State hospital could treat electrical sensitivities. During the mental evaluation I submitted to Dr. David Moron, medical documentation of the legitimacy of my condition and legal documentation showing how this injury was caused b overexposure to radiation. Dr. Moron claimed that he was not familiar with injuries caused by radiation and promised a release as soon he verified the fact that a case was pending on the US Supreme Court. The next day, Dr. Cannelus Caralampus a doctor familiar with electrical sensitivities evaluated my mental condition finding that the only problem I had was the difficulty of explaining to others that I am sensitive to environmental radiation. The medical records released by Dr. Moron claim that I have delusions of persecutions and does not include the findings of Dr. Caralampus. During the evaluation to qualify for rehabilitation services, Nancy Murray, counselor the Texas Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services excluded medical and legal document of the legitimacy of my disability and mental stability to deny rehabilitation and to blame my condition to a mental problem.
I filed a federal law suit to compel Texas Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services to provide rehabilitation technology and to compel Dr. Moron to amend my medical records. On a hearing before US District Judge Randy Crane, I introduced documents which Nancy Murray, a counselor for the Defendant Rehabilitation Agency, had excluded form the administrative record to deny rehabilitation services and to claim that I have a mental problem. The document excluded by Mrs. Murray included a decision of the Social Security Administration finding my electromagnetic sensitivity a severe impairment; pictures of the swelling caused on my face when exposed to radiation; and a document in which the President of the World Health Organization declares her sensitivity to radiation. The defendants did not oppose the evidence or their wrongdoing. However, Judge Crane adopted defendants' statements and which falsity can be verified by the record itself to imply that I am delusional and to dismiss the case.
In response to motion to recuse pointing to specific and concrete evidence of disqualification, Judge Crane did not deny his judicial misconduct, claiming instead that those without an attorney are not entitled to an impartial judge, abrogating well established constitutional protections. On June of 2007, US Circuit Judges Jolly, Dennis, and Clement, declined to consider evidence of fraud on the court and issued another warning of sanctions. Jesus Mendoza v Dr. David Moron, et al, US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Mcallen Division, Case No. 7 05-CV-184; US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. 06-40671. (Circuit Judges Jolly and Dennis were not qualified to hear the case, since they had declined to consider evidence of fraud on the court by Judge Hinojosa and Judge Ramos).
In retaliation for filing a case against Dr. Moron and the Texas Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services, the University of Texas Pan-American terminated my access to research on its library. Judge Randy Crane dismissed the case claiming in essence that those who do not receive Social Security disability benefits are not entitled to disability accommodations on public places, abrogating well established federal and state disability laws. Judge Crane lifted procedural obstacles to appeal the case after I sought Congressional help. In order to avoid the possibility that sanctions would be imposed on appeal, I filed a motion to certify that the appeal is not frivolous citing to the federal record conclusive evidence of judicial misconduct to benefit those committing fraud on the court. The Clerk of the court declined to present the Motion to the court and I withdraw the appeal. Jesus Mendoza v. The University of Texas Pan-American, US Dist. Ct. S. Dist. of TX., Case No. M-05-408; US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 06-41453.
I submitted to the City of Mission Police Department evidence of the electronic aggression and organized stalking. The Chief of police Mr. Lio Longoria claimed that he was to investigate the case himself. After examination videotapes of detection equipment showing high intensities of radiation inside our home, and of the pain and suffering of my children, Mr. Joe Gonzales an investigator for the police department, concluded that our home had been the subject of an electronic aggression. Another investigator, Ezequiel Navarro, claimed that the local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had directed him no to intervene, because of an ongoing investigation of my activities by the Central Intelligence Agency.
Based on these facts, and on the facts established by federal litigation, a law suit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. The law suit sought an Order to compel the Defendants to cease and desist from using radiation surveillance during any investigation of my activities. Without a hearing, and without allowing the Defendants to respond, US District Judge Richard W. Roberts, dismissed the Complaint as delusional or fantastic.
On November 21, 2006, Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Randolph and Tatel, Circuit Judges denied the Petition for Rehearing. The same day, Ginsburg Chief Judge, and Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, and Kavanaugh, denied the Petition for Rehearing in Banc.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a former White House aide, failed to recuse himself from the case. Judge Kavanaugh is disqualified to hear cases of domestic surveillance because he worked as a White House aid, and was involved in crafting strategies to conceal from Congress the harmful use of radiation domestic surveillance programs. To the best of my knowledge and belief, Judge Kavanaugh is the subject of a Congressional inquiry to determine if he deceived a Congressional Committee during confirmation hearings. On June 21, of 2007, the US Supreme Court declined to get involved in the case.
Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v Keith Alexander, in his official capacity as director of the National Security Agency, Michael Hayden, in his official capacity as Director of the Central intelligence Agency, and George W. Bush in his official capacity as President of the United states of America, US Court Supreme Court, Case No. 06-9569.
In a case challenging the legality of domestic spy programs filed in Chicago, Illinois, US District Judge Matthew Kennelly claimed receiving ex-parte communications from NSA Director Keith Alexander and from National Intelligence Agency Director John Negroponte, before dismissing the case. Terkel v NSA Cite
In Re Jesus Mendoza, I sought to depose some of the individuals engaged in organized harassment. After I filed the Petition, Mr. Clinton Welding claimed that his son was driving the vehicle that attempted to ram its back on my vehicle. Mr. Welding promised to provide the names and addresses of those engaged in organized harassment in exchange of a dismissal of the Petition to depose his son. Mr. Clinton breached his promise and hired counsel, who then filed a Motion to dismiss the Petition. Without a hearing, State District Judge Aida Salinas Flores dismissed Mr. Clinton from the Petition. I filed a motion to appear by telephonic conference to judicial proceedings as an accommodation to my disability. Without a hearing, State District Judge Bobby Flores denied the Motion. A motion to recuse Judge Flores is pending before the court.
In re Jesus Mendoza, 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Cause No. C-2817-05-C.
In Pedro S. Montano v Jesus Mendoza, a doctor familiar with my health condition filed a law suit in Justice of the Peace Court falsely claiming that rats had caused damages to his vehicle. For more than five years, Dr. Montano had abandoned the vehicle at my place breaching a promise to provide the necessary parts for repair. Before filing the law suit, his attorney, Mr. Carlos Ortegon claimed that although there was no legal basis for the law suit, he could manipulate the courts. Without allowing time for discovery, Justice of the Peace Ismael "Melo" Ochoa set date for trail and issued an Order to compel my attendance to trial under penalty of arrest without taking into consideration medical documentation showing that a prolonged stay inside a building was bound to cause me severe physical harm.
I filed a Petition seeking protection on the State District Court. However, the hearing on the Application for a Temporary Restraining Order was set until after the date for trial.
On October 27, 2007, Judge Ochoa allowed counsel for Dr. Montano to select as jurors persons that had declared their inability to render a fair verdict. Dr. Daniel Charles Brown claimed to be a friend of Dr. Montano, and Maria Lourdes Gonzalez claimed that she had been involved in repossession of a car apparently by mechanics. During a Court recess and while Petitioner was absent, Gonzalez was selected Jury Foreman. During trial, Judge Ochoa threatened to order my arrest when I opposed the false statement of Dr. Montano's counsel to the jury, and declined to submit my counterclaim to the jury. Although Dr. Montano failed to produce any evidence of the damage caused to the vehicle by rats, Judge Ochoa signed a judgement of more than four thousand dollars in favor of Dr. Montano.
State District Judge Noe Gonzales did not consider a Motion with supporting medical documentation to appear by telephonic conference to the hearing on the application to restrain Judge Ochoa from violating my civil rights. Judge Gonzales found no jurisdiction on the case, and asked me whether I wanted to settle the case in exchange of the money judgement obtained by Dr. Montano. I agreed to settle the case in exchange of the money judgement. After the hearing, counsel for Dr. Montano refused to settle the case claiming that the court did not have jurisdiction and the agreement was not on the record. An appeal of the judgement voided the judgement as a matter of law. I filed an Amended Petition seeking damages for the aggravation of my condition after I was compelled to stay inside the court room for an extended period of time. The harm caused includes among other things increased pain, which now requires the shielding of the thoracic box at all times, to avoid swelling of internal organs, and internal bleeding. After Dr. Montano defaulted on discovery seeking the identity of those who may be engaged in organized harassment, counsel for Dr. Montano and Judge Ochoa filed a forged "Agreed Motion to Dismiss" the Case. The same day, Judge Gonzales signed the Order of Dismissal. I filed a motion for a hearing to establish the fact that fraud had been committed on the court. Judge Gonzales did not allow me to appear by telephone to the hearing and dismissed the case. An Appeal is pending. At no time neither Dr. Montano nor Judge Ochoa have opposed the evidence of on the record of their fraud on the court. Jesus Mendoza v Dr. Pedro S. Montano and Ismael Ochoa, 13th Court of Appeals, Case No. 13-07-00146-CV.
The appeal of the judgement signed by Judge Ochoa resulted on a new trial. After Dr. Montano defaulted on discovery, Hidalgo County Judge Jaime Palacios denied my Motion to appear by telephonic conference to the hearing on my Motion for sanctions. The court's case manager advised me that failing to appear in person will result in dismissal of my claims. Pending before the court is a motion to recuse Judge Palacios. Dr. Pedro S. Montano v Jesus Mendoza, Hidalgo County Court at Law 2, Case No. CL-06-3256-B.
I have submitted Requests for access to the courts by telephonic conferences with supporting medical documentation to defend myself from the attempts to cause harm to myself and to my children to the Hidalgo County Judge Ramon Garcia, to the Office of the Administrative Presiding District Judge Mario Ramirez and District Judge Juan Partida to no avail.
For all of the above reasons, I request the US Attorney General to investigate this Complaint and that after an investigation, proceed accordingly against those responsible for the criminal acts detailed in this Complaint. If more information or documentation is needed, I will be happy to oblige.
Respectfully Submitted,
____________________________________-
Jesus Mendoza
2202 E. 28th St. Mission, Texas, 78574
Tel. 956 519 7140.



Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!

Friday, October 5, 2007

CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER...


Tuesday, June 26, 2007
CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER......



THIS IS NOT FANTASY OR DELUSION. THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO OUR FAMILIES. WITHOUT KNOWING, YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES, MAY BE NOW THE SUBJECT SILENT, INVISIBLE AND DEADLY SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE. This case is the tip of the iceberg of a slow motion and virtual genocide in progress. (6-21-2007)

At this time radiation directed from satellites are making homes, schools, offices, courts, churches, and even vehicles virtual microwave ovens. This case brings conclusive evidence showing how under the excuse of a domestic surveillance program, this Administration is using harmful technologies to commit crimes against humanity. This case brings conclusive evidence showing how this Administration has influenced federal courts to discredit as delusional, cases of electronic surveillance in order to conceal the fact that these technologies are in use for repression of those who denounce injustice. That is the main reason the President of the United States and the Governor of Texas should be compelled make a full disclosure of the radiation technologies used for electronic surveillance before Congress legalizes domestic spy surveillance programs.

Exhibit "1", (attached), is conclusive evidence of an electronic aggression in progress, and shows some of the physical harm, swelling, pain, and suffering caused on my children my in-laws and on myself by radiation directed by satellite as retaliation for complaining of racial discrimination and fraud of federal funds against prominency. (Exhibit "1", Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v Keith Alexander et al, Supreme Court of the United States Case No. 06-9569. If the electronic torture continues undeterred against those who are actively denouncing the electronic aggressions, imagine the harm inflicted on unsuspecting victims.
Please ask your federal and State legislators to make an investigation on this case, and to provide an explanation in writing to this case. Legislators have an obligation to tell you the truth. The question is whether congress can investigate when there is evidence of collusion on the federal courts to violate civil rights. Please share this information with others, so they can do the same. This in turn could spare lives and pain and suffering to innocent victims. Do not allow apathy, skepticism, or indifference make you another victim of these terrifying technologies.



WHAT IS SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE ?
At this time, government technicians, and surveillance contractors operating from secret locations are using satellite surveillance to observe and record even the most intimate activities of individuals. Satellite radiation surveillance technologies reserved otherwise for the military requires the bouncing of silent and invisible harmful radiation form the target's body to retrieve on a video screen, activity even inside walls or on a moving vehicle. Satellite surveillance uses global positioning radar, and technologies similar to the technology employed to remove kidney stones without surgery. Invisible laser beams are bounced from the target, and back to the satellites from different angles. However the concentration of radiation on a person, home or vehicle is harmful per se and can have deadly effects.

This case demonstrates that these terrifying technologies are in use by hate to commit perfect crimes. This case demonstrates that there are no safeguards in place to impede that the same mentality that tortured, maimed, and murdered women and children in concentration camps, use this technology to harm people in homes, vehicles, schools, courts, hospitals, and even congregations.
An electronic aggression can come from within the neighborhood, and there is nothing in place to prevent that neighbors use radiation as a weapon against each other. According to experts. simple modifications to existing technologies can make out of a microwave oven, or laser gun an electronic weapon that can be used to torture to death unsuspected victims. Local authorities are not equipped to detect this type of assault. However, the governor of Texas has declared his intention to legalize electronic surveillance programs similar to those employed by federal agencies, and does not deny the fact that radiation surveillance is already in use by Texas agencies.

HOW DO I KNOW IF I AM A VICTIM OF SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE?
An electronic aggression is very difficult to detect. Even after years of satellite targeting, a victim may not realize that her maladies are the result of an electronic assault. An electronic aggression is silent, invisible, and the physical harm can be attribute to natural causes. Even on the face of solid evidence showing that an electronic aggression is in progress, most people refuse to consider the possibility that this technology exists and that it is in use to torture to death unsuspected victims. On some cases, even dying victims are reluctant to believe that they are being tortured to death by satellites bouncing invisible radiation from their bodies. Those who have realized the electronic assault have been deemed delusional and have been unable to defend themselves.

Exposure to directed radiation can cause pain, swelling of vital organs, and other maladies that can be blamed to weight gain, aging, or other natural causes. Even low intensity directed radiation can impair a specific vital organ, or weak the immune system to cause what may appear allergies or chronic flu symptoms or predispose internal bleeding, headaches, visual, memory, concentration, breathing and speech impairments, diarrhea, convulsions, seizures, irregular blood pressure and heart beat, heart attacks, cancer, birth and development defects, crib death syndrome, brain hemorrhage, autism, and nerve damage.
Apart from gathering information, satellite surveillance is used to study the reactions of people when exposed to different intensities of directed radiation, to strategically exploit human strengths and weaknesses, in order to manipulate behavior and decision making, to disrupt relationships, to impair intellectual and physical abilities, and even to lead an unsuspected victim to acts of self-destruction. Directed radiation can strategically cause on the target or on bystanders, among other things, hyperactivity, sleep deprivation, fatigue, lethargy, apathy, mood swings, anxiety, irritability, and rage. These reactions can be used to strategically cause accidents, disrupt family, and business relationships, to inhibit worshiping in selected congregations, to disrupt sport competition, to inhibit voting in strategic areas. An electronic aggression can explain bizarre cases of family violence, road rage, unexpected aggressions by animals, unexplained deaths and suicides, death of immigrants by overexposure, strategic disruption of electronic equipment, cases of food and water poisoning, voter apathy in selected areas, and even health impairment of elected officials to gain legislative majorities.

WHAT MAKES POSSIBLE THESES CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY?
Lack of information on the use and abuse of these terrifying technologies. At this time the president of the United States insists that he can be trusted to use secret technologies to spy on Americans, without disclosing these activities to Congress.
The US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, does not deny the use of harmful radiation for surveillance and claims that directing harmful radiation into residences is legal. In effort to avoid responsibility for the harm caused by this harmful technology, the US Attorney General has delegated approval of radiation surveillance on Americans to the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Court a secret court. However, given conclusive evidence on the federal record showing how this Administration has influenced with impunity courts of public record to conceal the use of harmful radiation on Americans, relying on a secret court to approve the use of this harmful technologies, gives the President of the United States a blank check to commit crimes against humanity.

The following line of cases provides conclusive evidence on the federal record showing how this Administration has influenced federal courts to discredit cases of domestic spy programs to conceal the fact that electronic surveillance is used for repression of those who complain of injustice.
In a case challenging the legality of domestic spy programs filed in Chicago, Illinois, US District Judge Matthew Kennelly claimed receiving ex-parte communications from NSA Director Keith Alexander and from National Intelligence Agency Director John Negroponte, before dismissing the case. Terkel v NSA Cite

In Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v. The Thomas M. Cooley Law School, et al, Case M-99-77, U.S. Magistrate Judge Dorina Ramos transferred the case from Mcallen, Texas to the State of Michigan, despite of conclusive evidence showing the harm caused o myself by an electronic aggression that agents of the law school had incited as retaliation for denouncing racial discrimination. Judge Ramos disregarded conclusive evidence of the law school fraudulent activities within the state of Texas and the false statements made by the law school to transfer the case and to imply that I am delusional.

The litigation in the State of Michigan established the fact that the law school operated a scheme to deprive minorities of the opportunity to obtain a law degree, defrauding them of their federal loans, while giving law degrees to those affiliated with State and federal agencies. The litigation in the state of Michigan established the legitimacy of the harm caused by the retaliatory electronic aggression, and my mental stability. This case occurred when former Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court Thomas E. Brennan and several former Cooley graduates, now members of the judiciary, were operating this fraudulent scheme, and at the time John Brennan was heading the CIA's Counter Terrorism Center (1997). Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v. The Thomas M. Cooley Law School, et al, W. Dist. MI., Case No. 5: 01cv93, (2003). (After his retirement, John Brennan denounced the Department of Defense use of military technology for domestic surveillance as a major mistake, "Military Taking Bigger Spying Role in War on Terrorism", San Antonio Express-News at 3A March 8, 2006).

I filed a law suit against the US Attorney General to stop the electronic aggression after I saw two of my children with convulsions and seizures while radiation detectors were showing high intensities of radiation in our home. (Maldonado v Ashcroft, Case No. M 03-038. US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa assigned Judge Ramos to the case. Judge Ramos recused herself in response to evidence of her judicial misconduct to benefit those engaged in fraud of federal funds and retaliation. US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa reassigned Judge Ramos to the case. On a hearing before Judge Ramos, my wife testified to the pain and suffering caused on myself and on my children by high intensities of directed radiation inside our home. Judge Ramos altered the testimony of my wife to discredit evidence of electronic aggression and to imply that I am delusional. Judge Hinojosa disregarded the evidence of alteration of testimony by Judge Ramos and dismissed the case. (According the Dr. Jerry Polinard, a government professor, Judge Hinojosa former President Bush first choice for nomination to the US Supreme Court. Subsequently, President George W. Bush appointed Judge Hinojosa to head the US Sentencing Commission).
At no time the US Attorney General has opposed the evidence of judicial misconduct by Judge Hinojosa and Judge Ramos. (Maldonado v Ashcroft, Case No. M 03-038, audiotape of hearing, Docket No. 29, Docket No. 32, at five, Statement of Evidence, Docket No. 40).
During the litigation of this case, the US Attorney General did not oppose an affidavit of a former government agent who was sent to the emergency room with internal bleeding every time he offered to testify in court to the legitimacy of my claims of electronic aggression. During the litigation of this cases, the US Attorney General did not oppose evidence showing that three federal agents (Mark Miller, Michael Rodriguez, and Jeffrey Schrimer, who identified themselves to the principal of the school as FBI agents) engaged in harassment at my work place, a day I attempted to file a criminal complaint against those engaged in fraud of federal funds and retaliation. During the litigation of this case, David L. Guerra, counsel of record for the US Attorney General acknowledged my mental stability, and claimed that the use of ionizing radiation (x- and gamma rays) for surveillance of residences is legal. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v John Ashcroft, (S. D. Tex.) Case No. M 03-38. (Please See Exhibit "1" which illustrates the harm caused on myself and on my children by x- and gamma radiation).

During the litigation of this case, it was introduced unopposed into the record, video tape evidence of the pain and suffering caused on myself and on my children while detection equipment indicated an electronic aggression. During the litigation of this case it was established that federal agencies are using harmful satellite radiation technologies which are otherwise reserved for national security and the military to direct radiation into residences. The Court of Appeals recognized my electrical sensitivity the harm caused by the electronic aggression. However, the court declined to address the judicial misconduct of Judge Hinojosa and Judge Ramos. US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Case No. 04-40095, Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. S. Ct., Case No. 04-9908, (2005).

Judge Ramos and Judge Hinojosa declined an invitation by the Fifth Court of Appeals to engage the evidence of their judicial misconduct. The Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed the Complaint of judicial misconduct. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Nos. 04-05-372-0089 and 90.

The radiation aggression divested my immune system of the ability to tolerate environmental radiation. Exposure to radiation emitted by power lines, flourescent lights, video display terminals, air conditioning motors, cellular telephones, etc., causes me among other things, swelling of vital organs, internal bleeding, breathing problems, loss of concentration and speech impairment. My ability to work, to be inside buildings and to travel are substantially impaired. I have been critically ill several times, I am in pain all the time. An Administrative Law Judge for the Social Security Administration found my electrical sensitivity, a severe impairment. However, the Judge denied my applications for disability benefits.
On a hearing before US Magistrate Judge Peter E. Ormsby on November 21, 2005, counsel for the Social Security Administration did not oppose evidence of their false statements on a motion for summary judgement. Judge Ormsby expressed his sympathy for my situation and implied that a favorable recommendation was forthcoming. During the year 2006, the Clerk of the district court claimed that a Report and Recommendation had been issued but had not been entered, and then claimed that a Recommendation had not been issued. The case is now before US District Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. (Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v The Social Security Administration, US Dist. Ct. S. Dist of TX., Mcallen Division, Case No. M-05-133).

While my wife was absent, I was involuntarily committed to a state hospital after my mother acted on the misbelief that I was neglecting medical care and on the misbelief that a State hospital could treat electrical sensitivities. During the mental evaluation I submitted to Dr. David moron, medical documentation of the legitimacy of my condition and legal documentation showing how this injury was caused b overexposure to radiation. Dr. Moron claimed that he was not familiar with injuries caused by radiation and promised a release as soon he verified the fact that a case was pending on the US Supreme Court. The next day, Dr. Cannelus Caralampus a doctor familiar with electrical sensitivities evaluated my mental condition finding that the only problem I had was the difficulty f explaining to others that I am sensitive to environmental radiation. The medical records released by Dr. Moron claim that I have delusions of persecutions and does not include the findings of Dr. Caralampus. During my efforts to obtain rehabilitation services, agents of the Texas Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services excluded medical and legal document of the legitimacy of my disability and mental stability to deny rehabilitation services and to blame my condition to a mental problem. On a hearing before US District Judge Randy Crane, I introduced documents that had been excluded by the defendants form the administrative record including a decision of the Social Security Administration finding my electromagnetic sensitivity a severe impairment, pictures of the swelling caused on my face when exposed to radiation, and a document in which the President of the World Health Organization declares her sensitivity to environmental radiation. The defendants did not oppose the evidence or their wrongdoing. Judge Crane adopted defendants' statements which falsity can be verified by the record itself to imply that I am delusional and to dismiss the case.
In response to a proper motion to recuse, Judge Crane did not deny his judicial misconduct, claiming instead that those without an attorney are not entitled to an impartial judge, abrogating well established constitutional protections. (Jesus Mendoza v Dr. David Moron, et al, US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Mcallen Division, Case No. 7 05-CV-184).

The University of Texas Pan American terminated my access to research on its library after I filed the case against Dr. Moron and the Texas Dept. of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services. Judge Randy Crane dismissed the case claiming in essence that those who do not receive Social Security disability benefits are not entitled to disability accommodations on public places, abrogating well established federal and state disability laws. Judge Crane lifted procedural obstacles to appeal the case after I sought Congressional help. (Jesus Mendoza v. The University of Texas Pan-American, US Dist. Ct. S. Dist. of TX., Case No. M-05-408).

We have been victims of organized staking, including road harassment and attempts to run over myself and my children. Organized stalking is a copycat of harassment used in communist countries against those who oppose injustice. Electronic aggressions and organized stalking are part of the system to retaliate against those who complain of injustice. Organized stalking includes high speed road harassment and a pervasive monitoring of the target on public places to overload the senses of the target to cause harm in a way that appears natural, accidental or self inflicted. Most victims of electronic aggression are also victims of organized stalking. Hate groups in this area organize the local stalking groups. They fuel support and participation from neighbors, congregations, and even from border line mentally retarded individuals, by circulating false rumors that the target is mentally insane, child molester, drug dealer, a prostitute, homosexual, spy, terrorist, etc. On some cases, members are told they are helping police in conducting a secret investigation. On some cases, as payment for passing information, they receive gas, pizza, drugs, and even sexual favors. People from all walks of life, from the homeless to professional people, compose these groups. Members of these groups are found on the courts, universities, hospitals, the clergy and even on police departments. These groups may be responsible for causing many of the fatalities in this area.

The gang stalking intensified after I brought claims of judicial misconduct against Judge Ramos and against Judge Hinojosa. Some of the identified culprits include a self proclaimed apostle of a non-Christian- faith- funded congregation, a high school teacher, the wife of a high school teacher, and a pilot of a local bank. Without a hearing and despite of defendants' admissions and incriminating evidence, US District Judge Lynn N. Hughes, dismissed the case. Maldonado v Lindquist, et al, US District Court Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Case N0. H-05-97.


In response to complaints of electronic aggression and organized stalking, and after examination of evidence, an investigator for the City of Mission police department concluded that our home had been the subject of an electronic aggression. Another investigator claimed that the local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had directed him no to intervene because of an ongoing investigation of my activities by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Based on these facts, and on the facts established by federal litigation, a law suit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. The law suit sought an Order to compel the Defendants to cease and desist from using radiation surveillance during any investigation of my activities. Without a hearing, and without allowing the Defendants to respond, US District Judge Richard W. Roberts, dismissed the Complaint as delusional or fantastic.
On November 21, 2006, Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Randolph and Tatel, Circuit Judges denied the Petition for Rehearing. The same day, Ginsburg Chief Judge, and Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, and Kavanaugh, denied the Petition for Rehearing in Banc. On June 21, of 2007, the US Supreme Court declined to get involved in the case. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v Keith Alexander, in his official capacity as director of the National Security Agency, Michael Hayden, in his official capacity as Director of the Central intelligence Agency, and George W. Bush in his official capacity as President of the United states of America, US Court Supreme Court, Case No. 06-9569.

The following provides scientific information about harmful satellite tracking and surveillance used on Americans by this Administration.
"Some Aspects of Electromagnetic Weapons," Synopsis prepared for the International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium, by David Guyatt, (1996) Guyatt describes how harmful satellite technologies reserved for the military are used for surveillance and testing; John Fleming, "The Shocking Menace of Satellite Surveillance" Fleming describes how satellite laser technologies are in use to retrieve on a video screen, activities behind walls and even moving vehicles; Patrick Korody, "Satellite Surveillance within US Borders," 65 Ohio St. L. J. 1627, (2004), Korody describes how satellites bounce radiation from individuals to retrieve activity on a video screen; ; Mark G. Young, "What Eyes and Ears You Have!: A New Regime for Covert Government Surveillance," 70 Fordham L. Rev. 1017, (2001), Young describes how radiation surveillance technology can track an individual even among a crowd of thousands of people; Christopher Slobogin, "Symposium Crime and Technology: Article: Technologically-Assisted Physical Surveillance: The American Bar Association Tentative Draft Standards," 10 Har. J. Law & Tec 383, (1997), Slobogin describes the urgent need to regulate radiation surveillance to prevent abuse and harm to the targets. Lieutenant Colonel James C. Duncan, "A Primer on the Employment of Non-Lethal Weapons," 45 Naval L. R. 1(1998); Col. Duncan advocates a more open training of radiation surveillance in order to train more commanders in the use of directed radiation to attack or enhance human frailties and functions.
On January of 2007, in response to China's satellite target practice, the media explained how this Administration is using hundreds of military low orbiting killer satellites equipped with lasers and other harmful technologies to spy on Americans.
In response to China's satellite target practice, Mansour O. El-Kikhia, describes how this Administration is using hundreds of military low orbiting killer satellites equipped with lasers and other harmful technologies to spy on Americans. "U.S. must Get on Track to Keep Peace on Heart," (San Antonio Express-News at 7B, January 26, 2007).
The State of Michigan provides life without parol to murder by electronic aggression, (State of Michigan 92ND Legislature Regular Session of 2003, Enrolled House Bill No. 4513), while Chapter 170 of the Acts of 2004 on the State of Massachusetts provides two years imprisonment to simple possession of an electronic weapon. However, these protections do not apply to directed radiation by satellite into households for eavesdropping or research.
Victims of electronic aggression have gathered in Houston, Texas and in Washington, D.C., to protest against the electronic torture. Victims from around the country and from this area can testify to the misery caused by an electronic aggression.


The retaliation intensifies with the my efforts to stop this aggression. On February 20, 2007, a day before the filing of the case in the US Supreme Court, the swelling on the face of my three children increased, and my seven year old daughter suffered vomiting and diarrhea. My seven year old has been found with swelling, heart abnormalcies and speech problems, my five year old son has concentration problems, and appears disoriented, my two year old daughter suffers of inability to move fingers, and has grown a tumor on her foot. My children complain of pain when they spend time with me. Exhibit"1" is conclusive evidence of an electronic aggression in progress.

This is not fantasy or delusion. The facts stated in this document can be verified by the federal record itself. There is hardly anything more important that sending this documents to your legislators for an explanation in writing to this case. Ask your legislators what they plan to do about electronic and gang harassment. Do not allow apathy, skepticism, or indifference take away what we treasure the most. Please share this information with others, so they can do the same. This in turn can spare lives, pain and suffering to innocent children. Every day we live this torture. Please remember us on your prayers.
________________________________
Jesus Mendoza, 2202 E. 28th. St. Mission, Texas, 78574,
Tel. 956/ 519-7140.